Religion and crime are universal social processes, but they may first appear to be sovereign, even conflictual, social processes involving separation conflict, disaster, and disagreement; religion implies unity, peace and tranquility. However, crime can be global and religion can push actors to challenge and deny the social and political order. Therefore, following Lewis Coser's observation that all social life "always involves harmony and conflict, attraction and compulsion, love and hate", the analysis shows a similar contrast between similarities between religion and crime, which can be observed at all levels of the social structure: people, groups, social classes, societies and civilizations. Distinguishing a person's religious actions, as well as a social component, Sigmund Freud locates the origins of religion in the initial conflict between the intuitive impulses of the human being and the necessary restrictions; everyone should impose their facial expression to gain ownership in the decision-making process and have the ability to order in the social world. The Gods and religion enter, to compensate individuals "for the suffering and inconveniences that civil coexistence has imposed on them". In past centuries, religious imperatives moved the loves of Muhammad, Confucius, Siddhartha, Ignatius of Loyola and numerous others, in contempt of common worldly or offensive logic, to lead them to satisfy the needs of the world of the sacred, as they understood it. . Furthermore, in the modern era, we feel the coercive power of regulatory systems that, for example, allow the pharmacist to refuse to honor a medicine "the next day" as a contraceptive because of its purported properties. The use of religion as an agent of social conflict and social interaction......the focus of the paper......and their motivation. Only then can we determine how to further execute an already structured action plan that covers a case-by-case scenario since each of the different organizations that may possess a threat may have different ways of executing it. The response should be immediate and appropriate (timely/adequate measure of force used) in order to treat offenders humanely while diffusing the threat. Since it has been established that terrorism is impossible to predict. However, once again, with all the knowledge provided by the articles on the topics of terrorism in relation to religion and religious sects, my best supporting statement would be: investigate each of these organizations that emerge and assign a task force to analyze in their every move while being ready to cease their actions.