Most of America's diverse population knows something about the subject, slavery. Whether they learned about it from a chapter in a textbook or an educational film in history class, or whether they heard the stories of their ancestors passed down from generation to generation, we all have an idea of what slavery is . However, we don't know the basics. For example, when did slavery come into play? How did this way of treating “uncivilized” people like property become accepted, and what made it suddenly despised behavior? Slavery can be traced back to the original written documents 11,000 years ago during the Neolithic Revolution. It grew through the classical era, the Middle Ages and the modern era of Europe, spreading from the Norwegian coast to the beaches of Portugal. It subsequently developed massively in Africa, marking its territory in the empires of Ghana and Mali from the 13th to the 15th century. Eventually, slavery traveled across the seas to the Americas, evolving in the Caribbean islands, eventually challenging the morals of the United States. Since the dawn of time, slavery has changed thousands of countries socially, economically and politically. However, it wasn't until 1839, when slavery was finally called into question after the rebellion on the ship La Amistad in the Atlantic Ocean, off Long Island, New York. Although slavery was seen as a necessary evil in 1840s North America, the Amistad case helped give African slaves traveling from Cuba a chance to fight for their freedom, which profoundly reflects the conflict in Latin America, Anglo-American and African human rights. and economic rights. Although slavery was accepted in several countries around the world, Spain, the United States and B...... middle of paper ......slavery and abolition were evolving strongly, but soon others were introduced factors to stop the highly debated motion. This ruling angered slavery rights activists and the Spanish government's lawyer Holabird who represents Ruiz and Montez on behalf of. With the re-election of President Martin Van Buren in the near future, he sided with the interests of the Spaniards together with the Spanish Prime Minister, Cavallero Pedro Alcantara Argaiz. Cavallero made “caustic accusations against the American justice system and continued to condemn the abolitionist affront. […] He pressured Forsyth, Secretary of State, to look for ways to dismiss the case altogether” (Osagie p.12) citing the 1795 Pinckney Treaty between the United States and Spain. Overall, Holabird argues that the Amistad case should not have happened in the United States since they had no authority.
tags