Transitioning from one location to another can sometimes be a pain. For example, if you are moving, you will have to load the moving car and you may forget to pack the most essential item for most people. Comparing a book to a film is a bit like moving from one place to another. For example, Ford created the movie Grapes of Wrath and forgot to add the beginning of the book that establishes the setting and environmental graphics of the book. Next, everyone interprets everything differently, as the rhetorical perspective of Ford's book may be very different from the rhetorical perspective of the book's author John Steinbeck. I personally think the movie Grapes of Wrath was better than the book because of the roles it showed between men and women and the Dust Bowl setting. But you need to analyze the following parts to make a final decision: the rhetorical meaning of the novel, the similarities and differences between the novel and the film, and then deciding which is better of the two. First we must consider the rhetorical meaning of the novel. The book demonstrated great significant value on family values. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Family values ​​are the typical family where mom cooks and helps feed and support the family, grandparents who provide wisdom and guidance, children who provide laughter and joy for the youngest generation ever, and the dad who supports the family by making sure nothing happens to the family and ensuring safety for everyone. This is exactly how Steinbeck created the Joad family. The Joad family consists of Tom Joad, the supportive but trouble-seeking of the family, Ma Joad, the caretaker and unifier of the family, Pa Joad, the tenant farmer determined to find work and support the family, Grandpa Joad, who has a deep bond with farm and is deeply saddened when the family has to move, Grandma Joad who has always tried to see California in its beautiful state, and finally Winfield Joad who is the youngest of the family and Ma Joad is constantly worried about his well-being and his growth on a stable farm. For example, Pa Joad exclaims “It's a free country. In California they received high wages. ” (Chapter 12). This quote shows the sense of family value in the Joad family because Pa used to support and have high hopes for the well-being of the family. Next, Steinbeck shows the role of men and women in the book very clearly and careful. First, Steinbeck creates Ma Joad as the ultimate caretaker of the family. By creating Ma this role, Steinbeck adopts the Dust Bowl view of interpersonal relationships to create her as women in the 1930s women in the 1930s. Furthermore, it showed that the role of women was to provide food, give mental support to the family and take care of everyone. Steinbeck demonstrates the role of men in Tom Joad. Tom is always looking for a fair price for a house and a safe place to live. He always creates trouble to fight for his rights as a farmer and find a suitable agricultural job to support the family. He consistently shows his support for the family throughout the book. Finally, the most important rhetorical significance of the book is the way Steinbeck creates the setting. Steinbeck writes in chapter 1: “The surface of the earth became crusted, a thin, hard crust, and the sky became pale, so the earth became pale, pink in the red country and white in the gray country. "(Channel 1). Steinbeck explains the exact setting of the book word for word. Createvisually the image of farmland with the thin crust resembling the warm, dry soil of agricultural fields and the pink sky creating a beautiful sunset or sunrise image of agricultural life. Although the rhetorical meaning of the novel is the key to deciding which is better between the two, it is essential to compare and contrast the similarities of the differences between the film and the novel. First, there are many similarities that both the novel and the film share. Both the film and the novel show the interpersonal relationship between Jim the preacher and Tom Joad. As shown in the film, Jim and Tom meet under the great oak tree soon after Tom's release from McAlester State Penitentiary. This scene takes place in chapter 4 of the book and at the beginning of the film. This really shows the theme that time changes people and their opinions. Like when Jim was a preacher in Tom's church when he was a kid and now he doesn't believe in the concept of religion. Additionally, both the film and the novel illustrate that Tom has a boyfriend who has just gotten out of prison and is determined to provide for himself and soon his family and look at the world a little differently after his years in prison. Additionally, both the film and book do a great job of depicting farmers and their families struggling in these difficult times. Chapter 9 of the book and scene 13 show the families' struggle most clearly. Most farmers are forced to pawn most of their possessions because they simply need the money and don't have enough space to travel with it. All farmers have no choice but to accept middlemen who pay outrageously low wages because they are focused on supporting their family structure. Then there are some substantial differences between the novel and the book. The film begins with scene 1 when Tom walks along the side of the road looking at the farm fields and this is very different from the beginning of the book where the setting is set up. Having Tom walking down the street in the film I think is the basis of the film. Show the audience the setting and conditions of the farm. It gives the audience insight into the character value placed on Tom throughout the film. Furthermore, the fact that Tom enters at the beginning of the film shows the importance of males in agricultural life. Next, the book opens with Chapter 1 which describes the setting of the book and gives the audience a mental image of where the story will take place, which is not shown at all in the film. I think it's very important to add a chapter to a plot. This chapter presents the entire book for the public. For example, this quote from the book shows some settings: “In the middle of that night the wind passed and left the land quiet. The dust-filled air muffled the sound more completely than the fog. ” (Ch. 1) This really encapsulates the meaning of the land and the serious damage that wind and dry soil can do to the family's living conditions. While the similarities and differences between the novel and the film are important, the most essential part is which of these provides the greatest effect on people. I think the movie is better than the book. I think this is due to the visual effect of the film. I'm a visual person, so the film resonated with me. The film showed the great emotions of all the people. Ma Joad's attitude after scene 12, when the grandmother dies, was very clear. Mom is fed up with everything and just wants a home for the family and wants everyone to be safe and happy. After that the film really captures the audience with the setting. The setting really struck me because it is the basis of every story. I think Ford did a great job showing the fields and.