Confusion can certainly serve as an asset when exploring topics of investigation. This is based on the fact that the topic is not simple and has several explanations or causes. Therefore, research needs to study this topic thoroughly before drawing a rational conclusion on such issues. Confusion, rather than certainty, will require studying and researching many more questions. By doing so, the individual will certainly develop a clearer and more valid explanation to the topic. If someone knows a lot about the topic, they will do minimal work, whereas, if they are confused, it will take a lot of research and digging to figure out the underlying truth about such topics. A resource is like an advantage; therefore, confusion is an advantage when discerning the truth on the topic under consideration. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay I feel that being open to all the issues surrounding me would be very important when researching topics. Often, I feel like most of us are very closed-minded when considering topics for discussion. We have pre-set notions and beliefs that greatly limit what we produce, however, this only harms us in grasping the truth. I feel like one factor that isn't very helpful would be that exploring free writing wouldn't be that helpful. This step simply allows for thought and free flow of ideas, which is not necessary in the process. I say this because we must do so when constructing the argument. I would much rather produce complete, sensible ideas after thoroughly researching the topic, than have a page full of incomplete thoughts. Elements of a genre can definitely influence a topic in different ways. For example, one genre element is whether it is fiction or nonfiction. If it is non-fiction, we can be sure that the information is factual and has data to back it up. However, if it is fictitious, we should not believe what is said as factual knowledge supported by data. Nonfiction is generally very serious, while its counterpart is not. The topic is real most of the time in the non-fictional. Genre can also be related to where the article is published, whether it's a magazine, newspaper, or online forum. Credibility and the audience it is aimed at will be affected by such means. A prestigious magazine, for example, will be more credible than a blog post explaining a topic. The author should always have a specific audience and purpose in mind when crafting his or her argument. This is true because, without doing so, your desired results will most likely not be successful. For example, in the textbook, Trudie Freewrite's article is aimed at raising awareness of the inequality faced by those in minimum wage jobs. The author has this specific purpose in mind, and the intended audience is those who earn such salaries, as well as others who can relate to such issues. Without doing so, the author would most likely not achieve the expected results. However, by placing this short essay in a college textbook, it is possible to simultaneously achieve its purpose and intended audience. Truth-seeking and persuasion are extremely important factors when discussing the defense of an argument. Advocacy basically refers to certain recommendations or desired outcomes that one desires by writing on a specific topic. Therefore, the author of the piece should look for the truth, rather than lies. Because they will be deemed not credible if someone notices inconsistencies with their data and loses interest in their cause, be it.
tags