The first hypothesis states that the wage gap has grown due to an increase in dependence among the American working class. The argument goes that “lazy” nations have the opportunity but not the motivation to earn a livable income. In Autor's article the author concludes that “Even in a society with perfect equality of opportunity, children of successful parents would be expected to have above-average success as adults, simply because many attributes that contribute to success (appearance , intellect, athleticism) are partly heritable.”(Author) This supports the claim that the country's “lazy people” remain poor, under the assumption that the success of children is a reflection on the success of their parents. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The first proposition argues that individuals have the opportunity to advance and choose to be lazy and dependent on government systems. In turn, when these individuals have children, they will be raised in an environment that emphasizes the attributes that prevented the family from gaining upward mobility. This is a vicious circle that causes such a huge distance between the rich and the poor of the country. Proposition two states that the wage gap can be attributed to government affiliations with the highest-earning individuals and businesses in the country. The second proposal promotes the creation of an equitable tax distribution that will redistribute funds to help low-income individuals and families gain upward mobility. The Author discusses the process of creating equal opportunities for individuals of all socioeconomic statuses. The author states that the results of the programs may take time to appear and even extend to several generations. Author states that there are “numerous short-term levers that directly moderate inequality without imposing substantial economic costs: the application of progressive tax and transfer policies that finance investments and foster care opportunities for children of all socioeconomic backgrounds” (Author). This statement reflects Proposition Two's view of fiscal redistribution. In this section of the article the author explains that these types of programs can be useful in reducing the income gap, however such results take time. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Before reading Autor's article, I found the second proposition to be more accurate. After reading the article I confirm this choice. Proposition two is relevant in my life and I see the results. I would not be able to attend a university without the assistance of government programs. The first proposal contains some points that on the surface seem accurate, but it fails to take into account the fact that the cost of living in the United States is higher than the minimum wage. Individuals with a limited skill set and no opportunity to improve those skills are stuck in a difficult situation, when living on a wage less than their expenses it is impossible not to turn to the government (the creator of that wage) for help..