We all know that everything in the world is either science or the Bible. These two people are just two of the people who have made great contributions to science. They made it as we know it today. What we don't know is how they are similar and how they are different. Here is some brief information. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Glenn Theodore Seaborg is a very important man of science. He was born on April 19, 1912 in Ishpeming, Michigan and died in 1999. Throughout his life he contributed greatly to science, especially chemistry. Seaborg also directed nuclear chemical research at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. Glenn Seaborg won the Nobel Prize in 1951 for the discovery of new elements in the periodic table of elements. These elements are neptunium, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium, californium, einsteinium, fermium, mendelevium, and nobelium, also known as transuranic elements. Seaborg also rearranged the periodic table to show the relationship between the new elements he discovered and those already existing on the table. Another reason why Glenn Seaborg is important in chemistry is because he discovered the isotopes of over 100 elements on the periodic table. He did everything from research to teaching chemistry and contributed much to the improvement of science and mathematics. He is the author of many chemistry books and is said to have made the greatest changes to the periodic table of elements. I believe that the least notable of Democritus's great contributions was his "atomic theory." even some quantum phenomena. The most remarkable thing about Democritus' atomic theory was that he conceived it in violation of all the fundamental principles of modern science, especially the importance of empirical observations and "reasonable" testability. random; everything happens by reason and by necessity” is a thought that informs much of Democritus' writings, particularly his statement that “Everything happens according to necessity” in that atoms operate in a certain way and so, obviously, that. what happens in life happens due to the necessity of this operation. The two scientists are in no way similar, other than the fact that they made great discoveries in science. Another similarity is that they both had a view of atomic structure. They also defied the rules to make their hypothesis true. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, both scientists make great contributions to atomic structure or atomic theories and are different in many ways. However they are not really the same. Science wouldn't be what it is today if these two people didn't do what they did.