Across the world, gender stereotypes exist in the workplace. Typically, male counterparts take leadership positions in the workplace. However, when women are in charge, questions arise. This can be seen in two articles where Business Times author, Shiao (2016), argues for unfavoring the female boss and Balanced Careers author, Wolfe (2017) argues for favoring the female boss. While both articles are similar in their claims of people preferring male bosses, the difference is that the Balance Careers article is more reliable in demonstrating the reliability of the author, the reliability of the article, and the accuracy of the claims. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In terms of similarity, both articles agree that most employees are in favor of working for a male boss. According to Shiao (2016), when 76% of Singapore employees are compared with the world average of 65%, this figure is much higher in our country which shows the high bias towards male boss. Similarly, Wolfe (2017) stated that since 1953, in the Gallup poll, there has been a consistent finding that workers still prefer male bosses. This shows that even though both articles present different views on female bosses, the stereotypical mentality of the male boss as superior still exists among workers. However, in terms of determining the author's authority, there are differences in their areas of specialization. Lahle Wolfe has eight years of experience as a writer, where she advises women in corporate sectors and is part of the Women's Mentor Network. While Vivien Shao has five years of experience in journalism and mainly focuses on finance and has only written a few topics about women. This shows that the article written by Wolfe is more trustworthy as not only is she an advocate for women but she is also qualified as she has extensive experience, consulting expertise, interest in women empowerment and in-depth knowledge of women entrepreneurs compared to Vivien where she only have little experience and am not an expert in the field. The next significant difference is the reliability of the item. The Balance Careers article was published in the "Women in Business" section and the goal is to provide women with useful information in the business sector. Furthermore, there was verifiable statistical evidence to balance the argument of the male and female leaders. Instead, the Business Time article was published in the opinion section, where emotions and facts are used to influence the reader to accept the author's views. This can be seen in the informal language used in the article such as “you, me, our, we admit it” to form a one-sided view. Therefore, the first article is more convincing than the second because it is not only less biased, but it provides more factual and balanced information on the role of women as leaders. Wolfe's claims are supported by an external report. Wolfe (2017) stated that the attributes of initiative and competence, which were once considered the exclusive prerogative of men in demonstrating that they are better than women at the corporate level, have now been surpassed by women. This is true as Patel's (2013) report states that in Fortune 500 companies, when there are at least three women on the board of directors, they bring significant results such as improved profit margin and return on equity. Company failure will also decrease by 20% when at least one woman is on board. This suggests that the.