IntroductionThe Amazon forest is often at the center of discussions on global warming, in particular those on deforestation and the impact this has on a global level. At 2.1 million square miles, the Amazon is the world's largest rainforest; it is often referred to as the “lungs of the planet”. It plays a crucial role in controlling carbon dioxide emissions. This is supported by David Attenborough, Greta Thunberg and the 1.5 million children who went on strike at school to raise the profile of climate change. A growing number of people now recognize the problem it poses for current and future generations. Global efforts are now needed to reduce their effects, but without a joint approach the changes are unlikely to succeed. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Opinions on the impact of global warming differ. There are those who believe that financial issues, where large-scale losses could occur in some sectors, take precedence. Such as the costs that governments would have to bear, in order to provide investments to finance alternative modes of heating, travel and food production. President Trump has expressed his views publicly, believing that there is no solid and credible evidence to support this. American climate researchers, defending climate change, argue that President Trump's views are "hopelessly misinformed." In contrast, 99.99% of authors in peer-reviewed journals on climate change and the National Academy of Sciences support the statement that global warming is man-made and is caused by all human activities. In 2015, the Paris Agreement became a “historic” event by becoming the first single agreement uniting nearly 200 countries on the issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Dr Bill Hare, physicist and lead author for an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, says: "It's a victory for the most vulnerable countries, the small islands, the least developed countries and those with the most to lose, who have come to Paris and they said they didn't want sympathy, they wanted action.” There is, however, opposition to the Paris Agreement from President Trump; he insists that it is a costly and ineffective solution to the alleged climate crisis, which is his notice negatively impacts America's economic future and ability to govern itself. There is considerable data to refute this. The evidence produced to warrant the passage of this bill is considerable and the fact that a majority of world leaders have signed on to the. agreement would suggest that the research undertaken is accurate and comprehensive. Lauren Bennett explores the important ecological role that forests play in reducing climate change; provide food, medicine and livelihoods to people around the world; to the intrinsic values ​​of forests. It insists that these essential ecological needs are irreplaceable and at risk, and provides evidence to support the proposition that deforestation is having a significant impact on the world we live in and that the way we use our natural resources only serves to improve it. Lauren Bennett identifies key factors contributing to deforestation, each with their own causes and negative environmental impacts. He explores each of these in detail, highlighting that agriculture, livestock farming, and logging are major contributors. She argues that with increasing deforestation, many animal habitats are being lost, with fires causingthey push animals out of the forest, decreasing biodiversity and increasing the number of endangered and extinct animal species. This would seem to be a rational argument made by various wildlife groups such as the WWF and by esteemed commentators such as Jeffrey Hays and Colin Stief. The article proved to be solid and credible due to the author's position as a researcher at the Climate Institute. He is able to make a compelling, relatable topic, referencing well-known companies like MacDonald's, Burger King, and Pizza Hut who cleared rainforest to raise cattle for their burgers. While some of these companies have promised to be more environmentally conscious, others have made no plans to abandon this harmful and unnecessary form of animal agriculture. He concludes by stating that if we continue on this path, up to 55% of the Amazon forest could disappear by 2030. He also states that the next generation, attentive to the environment and ready to foster change, perhaps the final key to unlocking conservation and protection of forests and protection of the Amazon, concluding on a positive note for the future. The second source 'Deforestation Explained' explores the growing concern of global actions on deforestation and supports the claim that there is a correlation between our behaviors and deforestation, causing the situation to worsen. Christina Nunez, writing for National Geographic, explores this aspect, has covered energy issues for the website, so has a very credible opinion on this topic and writes with knowledge of the facts. He says forests still cover about 30% of the world's surface. territory, but they are disappearing at an alarming rate. Between 1990 and 2016, the world lost 502,000 square miles (1.3 million square kilometers) of forests. Ever since humans started cutting down forests, "Nature". About 17% of the Amazon forest has been destroyed in the last 50 years, and losses have increased recently. There is a consensus among all chosen sources that agriculture, livestock grazing, mining and drilling together account for more than half of all deforestation. Nunez balances this by pointing out that there is also some unintentional deforestation. Some are caused by a combination of human and natural factors such as fires and overgrazing. In this statement, he is demonstrating his awareness of broader issues that contribute to the same outcome. Nunez says we need trees for a variety of reasons, as they absorb not only the carbon dioxide we exhale, but also the heat-trapping greenhouse gases that human activities emit. It is these human activities that need to be identified and reduced. She suggests that tropical tree cover alone can provide 23% of the climate mitigation needed over the next decade to meet the goals set in the 2015 Paris Agreement. As a result, a marked reduction in tree felling is needed, a reduction of over-agriculture to provide meat that is exported west and reduction in the number of trees felled as a result of increasing urban expansion as land is developed for houses. The evidence produced in this article supports the thesis advanced by the author of my first source that by modifying human behavior it is possible to mitigate climate change. Nunez points to data to support his reasoning. The third source focuses on behaviors closer to home and is a series of Panorama programs produced by the BBC during October and November 2019. The first program “Climate change, whatcan we do?" focuses on the changes a family of four based in England can make to reduce their carbon footprint. The researcher and author of this program was Professor Mike Berners-Lee, a researcher and writer on the carbon footprint of carbon at Lancaster University in England The report highlighted the commitment of UK governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. It also strengthened the argument that there is a lot of information circulating in the public arena. Focusing on the daily activities of a typical family, the program highlights how each activity has a carbon footprint, with the average footprint of a family of four being 52 tonnes a significantly high footprint due to methane products from livestock, the distances from which such products are imported if not locally sourced; the impact of home heating on increased use of fossil fuels and the use of petrol-powered cars and diesel. While the program explores the huge amount of information available, it manages to demonstrate how small changes can impact global warming and suggests that if every single family made changes to their lifestyle, a dramatic improvement in climate change could be achieved. It also considers the positive effects of mandatory environmental food labelling, low-impact food production, increased incentives for farmers, increased infrastructure to support the use of electric cars and the need to change the world's biggest challenge. sustainable construction. The program provided a consistent message, using easily understandable comparisons and offering workable solutions. The second program "Meat: a threat to our planet" was presented by Liz Bonnin, (a biochemist and environmentalist) and referred to more global issues and the impact the meat industry is having on greenhouse gases. This program's report was even more shocking in its message, highlighting that meat production is one of the biggest threats to the environment. The speaker visited several areas where meat production and livestock farming are high and demonstrated how the practices used by farmers have not only destroyed wildlife and the natural environment, but have also resulted in the production of more greenhouse gases compared to all modes of transport combined in the country. world. It reported large-scale destruction of the Amazon forest, with 20% of land lost to livestock grazing, which could result in an area three times the size of the UK being deforested. The message of this documentary was clear: "the cattle were literally eating the forest." More than 200 million cattle are believed to have been grazing on now-cleared farmland, no doubt boosting Brazil's economy but also helping to change weather patterns around the world. The visual images shown in this documentary provided a clear and relevant message. The clear damage shown by deforestation to wildlife and plant life has been powerful. The academic supporters of this program, Professor Tim Benton, an expert in food systems, sustainability, climate change and biodiversity, and Dr Tara Garnett, whose work focuses on the contribution that food systems make to greenhouse gas emissions for Food Climate Network, only serve to strengthen its credibility. Conclusion Across the three sources, there appears to be a consistent message, that deforestation has a significant impact on climate change. It seems that the,.