The case Miranda v. Arizona was one of the most important cases of the United States Supreme Court, which established that before a police interrogation, a criminal suspect in police custody must be informed of his constitutional rights addressed in the 6th Amendment: the right to remain silent and in the 5th amendment, anything the suspect says can and will be used against him in a court of law, the right to an attorney and if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to them. There is no denying the importance of Miranda rights and the case discussed in the essay. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested on charges of rape, kidnapping, and robbery. He was taken to the police station in Phoenix, Arizona, where officers placed Miranda in line with 3 other men, but the woman he had kidnapped and assaulted, 18-year-old Lois Ann Jameson, was unable to positively identify him like her. striker. Miranda was then interrogated for two hours. During interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to having committed all the crimes against him while being recorded. However, he was not read his right to remain silent and to have a lawyer. When Miranda's case was brought to court, the prosecution's only evidence was the confession recorded during her interrogation, which was confirmed in court. Ernesto Miranda was later found guilty of all charges and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison. After his conviction, Miranda appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, and in 1965, the state Supreme Court agreed with the Superior Court's decision. Miranda was found guilty of his crimes. In 1966, the United States Supreme Court overturned Mr. Miranda's conviction and ordered that the State of Arizona grant him a new trial. Miranda subsequently appealed to the United States Supreme Court where the case granted him Certiorari, an order under which a higher court reviews the sentence. decision of a lower court. The case was argued before the Supreme Court for three days, starting on February 28 and ending on March 2, 1966. On June 13, 1966, the United States Supreme Court decided to overturn the decision made by the State Court. The same day the Supreme Court ruled that suspects' rights must be informed before interrogation. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Finally, this court case and this landmark ruling, which now calls the rights of suspects “Miranda Rights,” have created a specific procedure for police officers to follow so that when suspects are informed of the their rights, are fully aware of the declarations they make. The 'Miranda Rights' project has also shown that there will be negative consequences if the police do not disclose their rights.