The origins and development of capitalism as part of Karl Marx's broader discussion of the sociology of capitalism was considered capitalism by Karl Marx who presented it in an essay. As we know, in the 16th and 17th centuries, Marx recognized capital accumulation as a direct consequence of the discovery, development of maritime trade with the East Indies and China, and the colonization and exploitation of the Americas. When the development process of commercial capitalism began, it distinguished itself from the feudal capitalism that preceded it. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In medieval society there were peasants, feudal landowners, and a middle level of artisans. The social relationship between peasants and landowners, apprentices and masters, was of a hierarchical patron-client type, and often lasted a lifetime, with the patron providing protection and sustenance to his client, in exchange for the client's dedicated service and loyalty. The existence of commercial capitalism causes the advancement of the merchant class. As power grows, it becomes complicated both for the existing ruling class, the social order that supports it, and for the landowning feudal lords. In Marx's perception, there are two types of producers that emerged from the beginning, first, the revolutionary merchant who opposed himself with the craft guilds and the agrarian economy, and second the transitional merchant, who continued to maintain the direct profession of production by bringing in independent craftsmen. Marx saw these transitions as a barrier to the true capitalist mode of production. However, Marx in this mode of production, in which the producer remains in the same product, both as a problem for the capitalist and as a future victim of the development of capitalism. The revolution from feudal to capitalist exploitation brought about a radical change in serfdom. of the farmer-worker and, above all, the separation between worker and land. When the capitalist mode arose, it was triggered by the relative growth of world trade as a concern of the European advance in the Americas and East Asia and led to an equivalent growth in the need for goods. In the mode of feudal exploitation, the landowner take half of the farmer's harvest. The farmers themselves remained the contact with the production. Capitalist exploitation wants them to separate from the means of production to become “free labor” free to be exploited as wage workers. It therefore becomes necessary for the separate feudal relationship to break down to produce a pool of free workers. According to Marx, free wage labor has a double meaning. It is because they could bring their labor force as their own commodity, and at the same time, there is no other commodity for sale. One of the free workers was the owner of goods and the other was the owner of the monetary means of production and means of subsistence. When feudalism collapses, the feudal lord disbands their many retainers. Furthermore, the development of agricultural activity and the conversion of fields into grasslands causes the displacement of a large number of farmers, who are concentrated in urban centres. As farmers and vagabonds moved into urban centers, they provided an army of labor needed for industries. Therefore, the owner who produces the production is a free worker, who sells his labor as an exchange for wages. Nowadays we can see that work can be bought and sold in the market like the product. Marx saw this not only as a change in servitude, but also as a transformation into a commodity. The.