The Tent City Jail highlighted Joe Arpaio's service as sheriff of Maricopa County. Tent cities were developed to relieve the growing inmate population and as a punitive measure for many criminals in Maricopa County. The prison had a capacity of 2,100 people, although the maximum number of inmates was 1,700. The Tent City Prison had no air conditioning and forced inmates to wear pink underwear in the facility. Sheriff Joe's policies, especially when it comes to crime, have been significantly discussed based on ethical understanding and a human rights front. Joe Arpaio's critics had significantly questioned whether his policies lacked a strong emphasis on human rights and ethics. This article provides an evaluation of Joe Arpaio's policies based on deontology, utilitarianism, and Kantian ethics. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The key policy that Joe implemented during his time as sheriff of Maricopa was the infamous tent prisons. Inside these tents, inmates had to wear pink underwear under their coveralls, pornographic magazines were banned from the prison, and cooking shows were broadcast in the canteen. The inmates ate two meatless meals a day. The prison tents were not air-conditioned despite the fact that temperatures sometimes exceeded 120 degrees. Chain gangs were also implemented where women were placed in chain gangs. It has been argued that black women were heavily targeted and mistreated in this case. Latina inmates were not served sanitary napkins (Mak, 2014). Deontological ethics focuses on considering an action as written as wrong based on the underlying moral code and therefore the effects of the action are not considered. The actions and policies implemented by Joe Arpaio during his time as sheriff of Maricopa, particularly issues regarding the Tent City jails, are morally wrong. Joe called Tent City Prison a concentration camp and therefore it is very difficult to have anything productive or morally right in view of the concentration camps (Chonko, 2016). The sheriff's actions can therefore, according to deontological ethical theory, be considered unethical. The lives of the prisoners were made very difficult. Leaving below 120 degrees without air conditioning is torture and an unethical move, regardless of the outcome of the entire process. The fact that women of color were mistreated significantly demonstrates the fact that the Sheriff's policies and actions have failed the ethical test. The implementation of these policies has not been developed effectively based on a crucial understanding of human rights, considering the fact that prisoners also have rights (Barnett, 2012). The ethics of utilitarianism highlights the fact that an action is considered ethically good or wrong depending on whether it represents the interest of the greater ones (Frederiksen, 2015). Therefore, as long as the majority considers an action to be good, then it is considered ethically good according to utilitarianism. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's policies were largely unpopular among the country's citizens based on the tactics and environment in which the inmates lived. Many people in Maricopa and across the United States disagreed with the inhumane treatment of inmates, regardless of the outcome of the technique used. The fact that the current sheriff Ponzone gave priority to the closure of the tent cities and won the elections shows that many people within the.