In our unstable world, many crimes are committed on the basis of discrimination. And among these crimes, genocide appears to be the most violent and the most difficult to prove. This crime is characterized by the specific intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group through the killing of its members or by other means such as causing serious personal or psychological injury to the members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life intended to bring about its total or partial physical destruction; impose measures to prevent births within the group; or forcibly transfer children from the group to another group. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There are some cases in which a state denies the fact of genocide, or there is insufficient evidence to prove it, or other criminal acts are deemed to be genocide. This situation can be found in the Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania case at the European Court of Human Rights. In 1949, during the time when Lithuania was part of the USSR, a multi-party organization was formed that fought for the independence of Lithuania. Since 1951, Mr. Vasiliauskas worked as an operational agent of the KGB, on the territory of the Lithuanian SSR. On January 2, 1953, Mr. Vasiliauskas took part in an operation against two Lithuanian partisans of the Lithuanian Freedom Fighting Movement, brothers JA and AA, who were shot dead in the Šakiai area of ​​Lithuania. In 2001, Vasiliauskas, together with another co-defendant, was charged with the crime of genocide perpetrated against the Lithuanian partisan couple as representatives of a political group under Article 71(2) of the Lithuanian Criminal Code. In 2004, the court of first instance in Lithuania convicted Vasiliauskas of the crime of genocide against political, national and ethnic groups under Article 99 of the recently amended Criminal Code of 1998; and was sentenced to six years in prison. The Supreme Court subsequently held that the 1998 amendments to the Criminal Code established the elements of the crime of genocide and included acts aimed at the physical extermination of some or all members of a social or political group. This feature of the crime of genocide remained in Article 99 of the Criminal Code. In the case the court decided that the crime of genocide was committed based on the definition of the term “genocide”. Two people from a special political group were killed and they were killed because they were part of this special political group, which gave reason to pretend that it was indeed a genocide. But not everything is so easy. Subsequently the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights examined the question whether under Article 7(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights there was a clear legal basis in the law applicable in 1953. for the conviction of Vasiliauskas in Lithuania. The ECHR was also tasked with examining whether the national conviction for genocide corresponded to the crime and whether Mr. Vasiliauskas was aware of this definition of genocide at the time of his participation in the operation of 2 January 1953, which resulted in the deaths of two people . partisans. The ECHR ruled in favor of Vasiliauskas that there had been a violation of Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which in turn states that no one shall be held guilty of any criminal offense for any act or omission which does not constitute a criminal offense under national or international law at the time it was committed.Mr. The main argument.