Stem cell research is a growing field of research in the scientific community. It gained popularity when James Thomson and John Gearhart successfully extracted human stem cells in 1998. Stem cells are also known as pluripotent cells because they can be differentiated into any cell type. For this reason, stem cells have the potential to replace diseased cells. However, there is a lot of controversy surrounding stem cell research. This is due to the origin of the stem cells that come from the embryo. Extracting stem cells from the embryo raises the question of whether it is ethical or not. In 2004, California voters passed Proposition 71 in support of funding for stem cell research amid its controversies. However, there was much opposition after its approval. To ensure that stem cell research in California continues, there should be more regulations, additional funding, and increased educational programs to promote stem cell research in order to gain federal approval for stem cell therapies. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In 2004, California passed Proposition 71 which provided funding for stem cell research. One of the controversies surrounding the approval of this proposal concerns the regulation of facilities that would conduct human embryonic stem cell research, also known as hESC research. In August 2000, the National Institute of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services provided the first guidelines regarding human embryonic stem cell research. This was critical because it provided the first federal guidelines for stem cell research and allowed scientists to use existing stem cell lines for research. Scientists; however, he argued that stem cells degrade over time, so using existing cell lines would not be beneficial for research and could, in fact, show abnormalities. As a result, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act passed the Senate, but President Bush vetoed it the next day. In California, regulations on stem cell research come from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, or CIRM. However, CIRM has attempted to reduce regulatory controls on researchers. Another concern is whether state and national regulations will be consistent with each other. In order to improve and reduce controversy surrounding stem cell research in California, regulatory controls should be implemented more frequently for researchers and institutions conducting stem cell research. California should also ensure that its regulations match those nationwide, adopting rules that do not impede research but still ensure ethically legal processes. Furthermore, ethical training should be provided to people who will work with stem cells. Conducting the training annually can serve as both a reminder and a refresher on how delicate working with stem cells can be and how to prevent the misuse of hESCs. Educating those involved can help reduce the controversy surrounding stem cell research. One reason stem cell research is so controversial may be due to a lack of education on the topic. Due to numerous regulatory violations, iGenetic transfers have always been a sensitive topic for the general public. Controversies such as Martin Cline's gene transfer without approval and Woo Suk Hwang's illegal obtaining of human eggs have slowed stem cell research and raised concerns about its ethics. The publication of stories like these has caused the public to question the ethical and moral reasons for stem cell research. Furthermore, embryonic stem cells are of great concern to the public because they must be derived from the embryo after fertilization has occurred. However, there is less concern about using adult stem cells for research. Despite this, California voters continued to fund stem cell research. However, there were many setbacks once Proposition 71 passed. To combat this problem, there should be more educational programs in California that educate the public about stem cells at in order to understand its benefits. Educational programs can be offered through schools or even in public places to help people understand why stem cell research is important. Exposure to the benefits of stem cells, such as treatments for Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, cancer and diabetes, can provide support for stem cell research. Allowing people to see how stem cell research can help with disease and providing educational programs to help teach what stem cell research is all about can garner support for stem cell research to continue in California. The United States and China are currently the leaders in the field of stem cells. cell phone search. California, specifically, is a leader in promoting state funding for stem cell research. Since Proposition 71, only four other states have promised to provide funding for stem cell research. The lack of funding for other states may be due to controversies surrounding human embryonic stem cell research. When California's Proposition 71 passed, $3 billion in funding for stem cell research was approved. However, stem cell research projects have been delayed due to controversies following the proposal's approval. The passage was expected to not only provide funding but also increase California's appeal to recruit more scientists in the state to conduct their research. While it may be true that scientists will come to California for stem cell research, the general public is not very supportive of this. In order to promote stem cell research in California to the public, providing information on success stories can generate a positive perspective on the topic. Additionally, it may be helpful to provide information on how stem cell research in California can help or has helped its economy. Promoting stem cell research may be key to continuing funding for California. Since the passage of Proposition 71 fifteen years ago, the $3 billion for stem cell research in California has been depleted. Funding is needed for stem cell research to advance in California. To get more funding for stem cell research, both California and the National Institute of Health should be more involved in ongoing research. If voters were to approve additional funding for stem cell research, transparency about what the research comes from would be needed/3528593.