Topic > Animal Testing in the United States

Researchers in the United States use approximately 30 million animals each year to develop new drugs and test the safety of medical, cosmetic, or other products intended for human use. Thousands of research have been conducted on animals for over 2,500 years, and the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) currently regulates animal testing in the United States. Animal testing has become a topic of heated debate over the past 30 years. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The problem: Many animal rights activists and opponents of animal testing argue that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, so it should be banned or strictly controlled to protect animals. One of the main organizations against animal testing is Cruelty Free International. They are against animal experiments for both moral and scientific reasons. However, scientists, researchers and advocates of animal testing cannot agree with this idea as they see animal testing as the key to solving many current problems and prove their point with the fact that animal testing has so far provided humans many cures and treatments. and without them progress would be considered slow. Pro-Test is the main organization fighting against the extreme ban on animal testing. It organizes campaigns with the idea that support for animal testing is of fundamental importance for the progress of medical science. While Cruelty-Free International wants to stop this cruel activity and immediately encourage the use of alternatives, Pro-Test supporters are willing to continue until they find all the alternatives necessary to advance science. Overall these two organizations are on completely opposite sides of the issue, but they share a common goal: the use of alternatives when available and possibly the elimination of animal testing from experiments. This can be achieved by banning some unimportant animal testing and encouraging scientists to focus more on developing alternatives before testing. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Even though Pro-Test and Cruelty Free International are against each other in terms of animal testing as a whole, both seem to share a common belief that alternative testing methods should be used when available. CFI activists argue that replacing animals does not mean putting human patients at risk, but will improve the quality and humanity of our science. They believe that the development of alternative methods is growing. One of the most important tasks carried out by the Cruelty Free International scientific team is to encourage regulatory bodies to accept and promote alternative methods to animal testing..