Colonialism in a country is considered horrible as foreign powers invade, conquer and occupy a nation. Some settlers commit crimes against the people with impunity. Despite the dismantling of government institutions and their replacement with the absolute rule of the colonizers, the majority of the British people are still proud of colonialism and of the entire British people. Given majority rule, Britain should not re-evaluate celebrating colonial heroes by tearing down statues. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Most British people see colonialism as a positive force in the world. Anti-colonial sentiments are also ridiculous; therefore statues of colonial heroes should not be torn down. The statues remind people that a new colonization program should be started in less developed countries around the world. Statues of the heroes of colonialism remind people today of the horror of the colonial era and the changes that should be implemented (Robinson, 2007). The British should not bow to criticism directed against colonialism, which demands that statues of colonial heroes should be torn down. Criticism is objectively harmful and is not beneficial. The illegitimate need to tear down statues tends to offend the sensibilities of contemporary society. If possible, colonialism should even be revived rather than the celebration of colonial heroes re-evaluated. The statues are a sign of the struggle to legitimize the country. Furthermore, there is nothing undeserved in colonial tactics, which involved the invasion and domination of a people (Fox et al. 2012). Revaluing and tearing down statues of colonial heroes is a symbol of the destruction of beneficial colonial institutions. Statues remind people of the existence of such institutions that they rely on for a positive effect in contemporary society. Britain could harm its citizens if the government attempted to destroy institutions that have long benefited its citizens. Criticism of colonialism should not blame the British government for all its wrong doings. Anti-colonial arguments should be based on what might happen if the government were not operational. The celebration of colonialism should be maintained as many people were willing to tolerate the idea. The idea of ​​tearing down statues is, therefore, inconsistent and should be abandoned as nations depend on neighboring partners to initiate development projects. Most developing countries are also incapable of self-government (McQuade, 2017). The idea of ​​reevaluating the celebration of colonialism tends to revolve around a partial evaluation of the facts. The British people need to take off their ideological blinders and examine colonialism from an empirical perspective. There is no denying that the colonists committed atrocities against the native populations. However, when crimes against humanity are compared with improved costs of living and better governance, there appears to be greater business confidence as people look back at Britain's achievements. For example, when women are involved in warfare and promoting peace, statues of such citizens are significant in promoting the rule of law (Macdonald et al. 1988, p 56). Reconsidering the celebration of colonialism in Britain and the UK's toppled statues of colonial heroes paint colonialism with an image of illegitimacy. It should be noted that the 8).