Officer Terry McCarthy worked for the City of Tucson. He was a representative of the city court. He believed in prevention awareness and supported education program. He attended many public schools in Tucson. As an advocate, he gave numerous lectures on the variety of drugs and how drugs would impact the lives of high school students and their futures. His presentation approach was clearly informative and intense. The related classroom theme emphasized on substance abuse that would question making judgmental choices comes from a student. McCarthy explained how the drugs would be dangerous, how they are produced and why they would lead many high school students down risky paths. On the other hand, the unrelated topic was about drug policies created in public schools and how they enforced and disciplined high school students with prevention methods. Thus, prevention methods from drug policies in public schools changed students' lives whether they continued to use drugs or remained sober. Districts in Tucson required students to submit to drug tests when they were suspected by teachers or supervisors. . Teachers had the right to suspect and commit a drug incident upon notification. McCarthy said students would have their eyesight checked at security checkpoints at public schools. The new method for drug addicts: the pupil ladder. The pupil scale hated the range from white to red. They would have their eyesight checked before enrolling in their schools through the security process. The Drug Youth Trend slide highlights that “major marijuana users have been using marijuana in recent years. The male group used it more than the women. The largest group of people under 25 used marijuana. However,...... middle of paper......it is not the students who follow the worst path. In the present, the Supreme Court has addressed the new case of drug policy implementation with new guidelines in public schools. Many factors in public schools wanted to change the zero tolerance that would help high school students stay sober and develop their responsibility skills. Works Cited Ringwalt, C., A. A. Vincus, S. T. Ennett, S. Hanley, J. M. Bowling, G. S. Yacoubian, and L. A. Rohrbach. “Random Drug Testing in U.S. Public School Districts.” American Journal of Public Health 98.5 (2008): 826-828. Press. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374824/ Moore, Trent. "City Schools Expands Proposed Drug Testing Policy for Students » Top News » CullmanTimes.com - Cullman, Alabama." ATOM main news. Cullman Times and Web. November 30. 2013. .