Topic > General Gates at the Battle of Saratoga - 1676

Commanders at all levels face increasingly challenging scenarios as the operational environment changes. Some instinctively motivate and empower their subordinates to think and act independently, thus influencing actions during combat. However, those who understand the activities of mission command commanders will influence not only subordinates, but also the outcome of the battle. Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative in the commander's intent to empower agile and adaptable leaders.1 The commander who understood l Major General Horatio Gates commanded the mission. General Gates at the Battle of Saratoga successfully used mission command by guiding, understanding, visualizing, and evaluating. The Revolutionary War began in 1775 as a result of the political struggle for American independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain.2 In 1776, British strategists devised a plan to isolate the northern colonies where patriot support for independence was greatest. The plan was to advance south from Canada along the Hudson River Valley and converge on Albany, New York.3 The British forces numbered 6,500 men and were a mix of British regulars, Canadians, Hessian Germans, and colonists loyal to Britain4 . Major General John Burgoyne commanded the British forces. In command of the Northern Department of the Continental Army was General Gates, a former British officer. After assuming command, General Gates' forces numbered 4,500 and were a mix of Continental troops and local militia.5 General Gates' mission was to block the British advance on Albany at Saratoga. The Battle of Saratoga consisted of two separate...... middle of paper...neral Gates did not deviate from his plan when the risk outweighed the reward. If he had committed his reinforcements and lost, he would have exposed his left flank and jeopardized the advantageous position he held, which could have led to a British victory. Accepting risk is an inherent necessity of past and present commanders. General Gates knew that a purely defensive operation was risky, but he also knew that engaging the British in open terrain was an even greater risk. Commanders today should consider the implications of accepting too great a risk as they develop the situation and operational approach toward the desired end state. Whatever the mission, by empowering subordinates, enabling disciplined initiative, and guiding the operational process, commanders will not only provide the necessary and desired leadership, but will influence the outcome of the battle..