(WHO 2000; Gibson, 2005)1.3 Advantages and limitations of anthropometric measurements Various methods have both advantages and limitations. Furthermore, they may provide sources of measurement error. (Ulijaszek, 1999; Willet, 1998; Gibson, 2005) Regarding the strength of anthropometric measurements, common measurements can be considered non-invasive, inexpensive and suitable methods for assessing nutritional status in population studies. However, many anthropometric techniques are prone to errors that could reduce their precision and affect their accuracy. (Sicotte et al, 2010; WHO, 2000)1.4 Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study report was to interpret and evaluate nutritional status information from measurements such as height, weight, waist circumference, ulna length and mid-arm circumference (MUAC) assessed during a