For example, in non-emergency situations, those that include public self-awareness can increase through the use of signs. In this case, cues to responsibility may include the use of technology that can reverse the bystander effect (Marco van Bommel, Jan-Willem van Prooijen, Henk Elffers, & Paul Van Lange, 2012). The technology is useful in many urban cities as a crime deterrent. In contrast, Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin Akert, and Samuel R. Sommers, suggest that people may be less likely to help in an urban environment due to stimulation overload in compassion toward rural environments (Aronson et al. , 2016). . It is interesting to note PM Markey's (2000) and researchers' hypothesis that a study of using a computer environment will produce a request for assistance faster in reaction times in an online chat room. However, the requesting person's request was fulfilled by individual helpers more quickly than by a group (PM Markey, 2000). The bystander phenomenon therefore remains intact as Darley and L postulate regarding larger group size with less intervention, and knowing someone by name increases assistance and can eliminate the bystander