Complications in the decision-making process arise in normal international business operations. Laws help define the broader ethical and social responsibility that every company has to the government and its citizens; however, these are only the minimum requirements and require further moral testing. The behaviors may not be illegal, but it does not mean that their actions are considered morally acceptable. Therefore, business practices should follow legal lines and practice according to moral requirements. Therefore, an ethical response applicable to both class two and class three corruptions would be serious, while class one corruption would be in a gray area of ​​concern. Sectors two and three do not respect all three ethical principles. The utilitarian ethic of the common good is not expressed in these accounts because taxes are not paid and the best companies do not win. Instead, the company with the most influence wins, leaving the domestic electorate with inferior products and less international taxation. Furthermore, these two actions deny the parties' right to act freely because they are forced to act through corruption. Terminating contracts or forcing companies to pay customs reduces the party's freedoms because their jobs are at stake, thus forcing compliance. Furthermore, these actions are not fair or just for all parties involved. Companies that cannot compete with other companies' corruption are pushed to the periphery of the business world and lose sales as a result. Therefore, action is needed to counter these two corruption classifications.Sector one; however, it lies within an ethical gray area. Their practice generally does not harm the common good and can benefit them. The relevant constituencies are strengthened because they increase… half of the paper… because corruption would become less fluent. As punishment increases, the frequency of crime decreases. Indeed, creating new policies that address corruption and creating new control and enforcement mechanisms would reduce the rate of corruption. However, companies would rely on government efforts to control corruption, likely creating further corruption in the process. Corporations would have to bribe government officials to investigate the corruption of others, thus creating more corruption in the process. The international community must create new and improved ways to level the corruption playing field to Transparency International standards. However, greedy individuals and corrupt cultures produce an international business culture in which corruption is the norm. As long as cultural norms around corruption are not changed, the propensity for corruption will remain the same, in the opinion of the review.