N. I disagree with Emanuela that the emissions deception had no negative consequences. Even if families do not get cancer or disease from NOx vehicles that pass through the yard only once and do not directly and seriously affect the family, it is unethical to ignore even a small scale of negative externalities. According to the textbook, a consequentialist approach is based on the principle that ethical action is one that produces good consequences or good results. If your mother just bought some new clothes and asks you what it looks like, it follows that the ethical response is to be honest. If you think the clothes make her look old or unattractive, you should say so. You shouldn't say “You look great, Mom” (pages 51-52). Therefore, if you know the fact that NOx emissions negatively harm the environment, you should admit and be honest in your emissions cheat. Furthermore, they must demonstrate the good consequences of deception on emissions if they do not declare any harm. 7) Roseanna Tamburri describes the research of Dr. Pamela Murphy. How do people rationalize questionable ethical actions, such as cheating and