He then separates the concept into two parts which he calls 'literary stylistics' and 'linguistic stylistics'. McMenamin emphasizes the idea that literary stylistics conventionally deals with "matters of aesthetic and linguistic conformity." Instead, it refers to linguistic stylistics as an evaluation of perceived style markers that are used by both groups and individuals. Burrows (1992) interprets stylometry as an expansion of literary stylistics, which has at its core the underlying hypothesis that each author has a unique writing habit that can be seen or represented in characteristics such as the use of vocabulary, sentence structure or complexity and phraseology. This is then grouped and measured or counted. However, one of the most significant assumptions about stylistics is that they are fixed and unconscious practices. Furthermore, the general purpose of stylometry, especially in a forensic linguistic context, is to determine the authorship of a text. As mentioned above, this is achieved by having a sample of texts by known authors from various authors which can then be compared to the anonymous text in