This article has two purposes: the first describes the elements necessary to build an effective enhancement and the second how to use these elements to achieve your goal. The topic I selected is; to try juveniles as adults who commit serious crimes and to allow the reader to make an informed decision on the facts presented. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, rhetoric is defined as involving the art of speaking or writing formally and effectively to persuade or influence people. (Merriam-Webster). Rhetoric dates back to the time of Aristotle, who considers it a counterpart to both logic and politics, and calls it “the faculty of observing in each case the means of persuasion available” (Wikipedia, Rhetoric). According to Aristotle, rhetoric provides problem solving, learning and discovery that provides a solution that is not guaranteed to be optimal (Wikipedia heuristic). For a discussion to take place there must be one or more events that give rise to a discussion or controversy between the author and the reader (Phelps). There must be a connection between the writer of the work and the reader who will react positively or negatively to what the author is trying to convey (courses.durhametech). The five rhetorical canons that outline the tasks necessary to design a persuasive speech were first shaped by classical Rome for invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery. Wikipedia Rhetoric). Today Rhetoric Situation is synonymous with the acronym TRACE: Text, Reader, Author, Constraints, and Exigence, necessary to formulate an increase (Phelps). TRACE elements contain a series of questions that need to be critically analyzed regarding a topic mentioned by Rusian Phelps: • Text: what kind of text is it? What is the author's main argument? Is the thesis made explicit or does the reader have to deduce the argument from the supporting data? What style is the text, casual or formal? Does the author have respect for the reader, is the language condescending or arrogant? Is the language difficult to understand? The text appears credible, is well organized or incoherent?