IntroductionTerrorism has become a global threat. Different terrorist factions are driven by different ideologies, which are amplified by specific influential leaders in these factions. This article explores the different ideologies that support and deny the environment. More specifically, this paper takes a debate approach between two individuals who share different opinions regarding terrorism. This is a dialogue between Andrew who opposes the idea of ​​terrorism and Fayed who supports the idea of ​​terrorism. This article argues that the subjective stereotypes enacted by various governments make it appear that terrorist factions are always in the wrong as these governments continue to kill mercilessly in the name of democracy and maintaining national integrity. The Terrorists' Tacit Message Argument That said, it is clear that before September 11, 2001, terrorism was nothing more than a flawed idea that could only operate with limited capabilities. They had little funding and their capabilities were limited to the funds they could obtain. This has made it difficult for these factions to cause global chaos, especially in countries like the United States (Saleem and Thomas 15). However, the fact that terrorist factions can infiltrate such a superpower indicates that the factions have reached a new dimension and motivation. More importantly, they are capable of both threatening senior government officials and even attacking others in various countries around the world. The main objective of the terrorist faction is to instill fear in the hearts of men and therefore they are a plague that must be eliminated by any means possible. It is therefore the responsibility of all governments to eradicate terrorist factions using any means possible, including targeted attacks on...... middle of paper ....... Indirect Responsibility for Terrorist Acts: Redefining the Concept of Terrorism Beyond violent acts. Leiden [Netherlands]: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 2009. Discovery eBooks. Network. 5 July 2014. Moghaddam, Fathali M. From the perspective of terrorists: what they experience and why they come to destroy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Security International, 2006. Discovery eBooks. Network. July 5, 2014.Oh, Onook, Manish Agrawal, and H. Raghav Rao. “Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Theoretical Analysis of Tweeting Rumors During Social Crises.” MIS Quarterly 37.2 (2013): 407-A7. Business origination completed. Network. July 5, 2014.Saleem, Mohammed M., and Michael K. Thomas. “Reporting the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks in American Social Studies Textbooks: A Muslim Perspective.” High School Journal 95.1 (2011): 15-33. Premier of academic research. Network. 5 July 2014.